Today we have our fourth guest blogger here at the IHEC Blog. My colleague Erika Mercer from The University of Chicago comments on a recent article by Jane Knight about the unintended consequences of internationalization. Erika’s post follows:
A recent article by Jane Knight in the Boston College Center for International Higher Education’s quarterly journal International Higher Education examined the unintended consequences of internationalization. One such unintended and often rather problematic consequence she notes is the “rankings race” – institutions competing for prestige through international and regional rankings.
The increased focus on numbers and rankings as a means of determining value in higher and international education is alarming, certainly, as it can take our eyes off of the higher aims and potential of international education. This trend, however, could unfold in interesting ways given the current economic recession. With numbers in international education (enrollments, budgets, etc.) falling as they are in many cases, I wonder whether we might be forced to look away from them as indicators of success and instead look to more abstract (though harder to measure) goals. The silver lining of the current recession may be a window in which we can advocate for meeting the less tangible goals of international education and focus on quality rather than quantity. Idealistic, certainly! But as many of us find ourselves working within smaller budgets (and perhaps with smaller cohorts of students), it may be useful to consider free or inexpensive ways to tailor our programming and educate students about larger, important concepts (for example, citizen diplomacy) -- those hard-to-measure-but-good aspects of internationalization.
In considering Dr. Knight’s article, another unintended consequence of internationalization that comes to mind is the increased need for (obsession with?) accountability. As we’ve seen, the cry for accountability has already echoed through many other facets of higher education. As exchange programs, joint degree programs, etc. grow, we'll feel ever more the need to be transparent and prove legitimacy. This, of course, brings us back to numbers…
Previous IHEC Blog posts focusing on rankings can be found here:
http://ihec-djc.blogspot.com/2008/10/qs-world-rankings.html
http://ihec-djc.blogspot.com/2008/08/2008-academic-ranking-of-world.html
http://ihec-djc.blogspot.com/2008/08/forbescom-enters-college-ranking.html
http://ihec-djc.blogspot.com/2008/12/100-free-college-rankings.html
A Source for News and Discussion on International Educational Exchange & Mutual Understanding
Showing posts with label Academic Rankings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Academic Rankings. Show all posts
Monday, February 9, 2009
Thursday, December 25, 2008
100 Free College Rankings
I occasionally write about various academic rankings around the world and thought readers might find the following "100 Free College Rankings (Traditional, Unorthodox and Just Plain Crazy)" to of interest.
You can access this list here: http://tinyurl.com/57gz49
You can access this list here: http://tinyurl.com/57gz49
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
THE-QS World Rankings
Readers who are interested in the various rankings of world universities are probably aware that the THE-QS (Times Higher Education and British publish QS) rankings were recently published. You can access the rankings here: http://tinyurl.com/4hutba
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Forbes.com Enters the College Ranking Business
As reported in the August 14, 2008 issue of insidehighered.com, Forbes has now entered the college ranking business. What has perhaps drawn the most attention and concern is the methodology used in its rankings. Richard Vedder, an economist at Ohio University and the Center for College Affordability and Productivity (CCAP), developed the following five components used to compile the new Forbes.com rankings:
1. Listing of Alumni in the 2008 Who's Who in America (25%)
2. Student Evaluations of Professors from Ratemyprofessors.com (25%)
3. Four- Year Graduation Rates (16 2/3%)
4. Enrollment-adjusted numbers of students and faculty receiving nationally competitive awards (16 2/3%)
5. Average four year accumulated student debt of those borrowing money (16 2/3%)
You can access the Forbes rankings on the forbes.com website.
1. Listing of Alumni in the 2008 Who's Who in America (25%)
2. Student Evaluations of Professors from Ratemyprofessors.com (25%)
3. Four- Year Graduation Rates (16 2/3%)
4. Enrollment-adjusted numbers of students and faculty receiving nationally competitive awards (16 2/3%)
5. Average four year accumulated student debt of those borrowing money (16 2/3%)
You can access the Forbes rankings on the forbes.com website.
Monday, August 18, 2008
2008 Academic Ranking of World Universities
Shanghai Jiao Tong University has recently released their annual Academic Ranking of World Universities on their website. You can access the rankings (g with rankings from 2003-2007) here: http://www.arwu.org/rank2008/EN2008.htm
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)