Showing posts with label International Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label International Education. Show all posts

Monday, July 26, 2021

Joint Statement by the U.S. Department of State & the U.S. Department of Education of Principles in Support of International Education

Joint Statement by the U.S. Department of State & the U.S. Department of Education of Principles in Support of International Education - Reengaging the World to Make the United States Stronger at Home, A Renewed U.S. Commitment to International Education. Issued July 26, 2021 at https://bit.ly/3y8nNmn



Friday, July 23, 2021

U.S. Secretary of State & U.S. Secretary of Education to Address 12th Annual EducationUSA Forum on July 26, 2021

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to highlight value of International Education at the Department’s 12th Annual EducationUSA Forum on July 26th. U.S. Secretary of Education Dr. Miguel Cardona will also address the Forum. Media Note via the Office of the Spokesperson [July 23, 2021] available at https://bit.ly/3kU7c1J


Tuesday, April 27, 2021

Upcoming Free and Low Cost Professional Development Opportunities for International Educators

The following is a copy and paste from a message my colleague Jessica Oldford, Interim Managing Director, Global Initiatives at the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan – Ann Arbor, posted to a shared professional network.  Jessica gave me permission to copy and paste her message into this IHEC Blog post as I think others will find her compilation helpful.

The last point will take place tomorrow so you'll want to register ASAP if you're interested.


Thursday, February 25, 2021

EdTech for International Education via the Gateway International Group


The Gateway International Group just launched a compilation of EdTech companies/platforms for International Education. Compiled and edited by Erin Niday and Tony Ogden, this compilation has the goal of highlighting those EdTech platforms that have the potential to transform next generational international learning and engagement. You can learn more at https://gatewayinternational.org/edtech/.

Note: I'm an affiliate of the Gateway International Group but receive no compensation for this post.

Friday, October 23, 2020

Pondering the Post-Pandemic Study Abroad Landscape by Adam Rubin


 

The following post was originally published on September 1, 2020 by Adam Rubin on LinkedIn. I found Adam’s post to be very informative and thought provoking and I asked Adam if I could post his piece to IHEC Blog as I think readers will also appreciate his thoughts. You can connect with Adam via his LinkedIn profile and via AWR International which is his international education and business consulting work.

Pondering the Post-Pandemic Study Abroad Landscape

As someone who has devoted the past 25+ years of my life to international education, I’ve witnessed the impact of global health crises, wars and terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and economic recessions on study abroad, educational travel, and student exchange.

With each subsequent challenge and incident, our field has adapted, adjusted, and rebounded. International education programs are designed to provide students with the opportunity to gain new academic, personal, and professional skills, and I, like many of my colleagues and friends, often claim that my personal study abroad experience helped make me a more resilient and confident individual.

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting global economic recession have tested our field in unprecedented ways, and we are far from steering our ship safely back to harbor. With borders closed, visa processing backlogged, and the vast majority of study abroad for fall 2020 cancelled, U.S. study abroad has been decimated this fall and remains highly fragile for spring 2021. 

A recent IIE Snapshot series included an analysis of the pandemic’s impact on both international students coming to the U.S. and U.S. students studying abroad. While IIE survey data indicates that the majority of U.S. institutions continue to plan for study abroad in spring 2021, nearly 80% of respondents anticipate a sharp decrease in their study abroad enrollments for the 2020-21 academic year.

Many study abroad professionals report that the needs of their offices have been put on the side burner as their institutions choose to focus on larger overall financial issues and plans for the fall 2020 semester. In a recent Business Insider article widely circulated, NYU Professor Scott Galloway suggests that the current pandemic could result in hundreds of U.S. colleges and universities going out of business completely.

The Impact on Student Mobility and International Education is Global

International education involves careful and creative collaboration between various stakeholders around the world, including schools, faculty, administrators, students, families, and community organizations. Prior to 2020, when an issue or incident impacted one country or region, we were all able to pivot and adjust in order to maintain a wide range of program options for our students. Today, however, we are faced with the reality that all countries and all regions of the world are struggling to overcome the pandemic. 

A recent NAFSA publication regarding the impact of COVID-19 on international education estimates that a 25% decline in international student enrollments here in the U.S. would result in a loss of $10 billion and more than 100,000 jobs. It also mentioned that numerous study abroad organizations have already reduced their global staff levels by more than 50%. Recent indicators suggest that the losses and layoffs are likely to increase due to the continuation of the pandemic around the world. When looked at through a global lens, the economic impact on countries that host and send significant numbers of students abroad is truly staggering.

With global mobility at a standstill and schools struggling to navigate the challenges of on-line and hybrid programs and myriad concerns about the health and well-being of our students, teachers, and staff, this new global “normal” has resulted in financial and administrative chaos for schools and panic, fear, and frustration for many people. Thousands of international education jobs have been lost, thousands of programs cancelled and suspended, and multiple institutional and organizational doors shuttered around the world, as students are unable or unwilling to study abroad, enroll in full-time degree programs, or participate in short-term educational training or travel programs.

However, much like the students who we support on international programs, I believe that the current situation is forcing us to be more resilient, develop new strategies for adjusting to unfamiliar territory, and, in many ways, learn a new language that will allow us to successfully adapt, survive, and eventually succeed. Our global community has shown its resilience through the creation of new virtual learning opportunities, development of creative and adaptive academic calendars, and the embrace of new technologies and training.

Virtual Learning is Here to Stay

Virtual courses and internships, once previously guaranteed to generate eye rolls and frowns from international educators, are now gaining in support and appreciation due to their ability to provide increased global access to students who might not be able to do a more traditional study abroad program or internship due to the current pandemic and other barriers associated with cost or academic restrictions.

Further, these new program models are providing students with the opportunity to learn from professors around the world, develop professional skills through global internship projects, and, at least some level, learn about new cultures and communities.

While most of us will always prefer the traditional in-country options, these virtual programs will remain valuable long after COVID-19 has ended. Many colleges and universities are still contemplating how these virtual courses and internships will fit into their academic systems, but more institutions are starting to recognize the academic validity of these experiences and opportunities.

For some institutions, these external virtual opportunities will be a welcome addition to their programs. For others, however, they will be seen as unwanted or unacceptable threats to their own academic programs and revenue streams.

Student Demand for Study Abroad vs. Pandemic Realities

Student demand for international exchange and travel will likely continue to be strong going forward, and many feel that the current restrictions and home confinement reality will make students even more eager than usual to study abroad in the future.

However, demand aside, there are other barriers that will need to be addressed before international education can start to make a true recovery. First and foremost, the virus itself must be contained through the development of effective and safe vaccinations. Next, borders will need to open and remain open, and transportation networks will have to be rebuilt and restarted.

Schools around the world will need to stabilize their academic programs and calendars, rebuild lost revenue through enhanced admissions efforts and proactive financial aid initiatives, and restructure teams that lost valuable staff positions due to the pandemic. 

While student demand for study abroad will eventually rebound, many of us believe that study abroad enrollments will take at least 2-3 semesters post-pandemic in order to truly return to more normal levels. This is due to several factors.

First, many students are unable to return to their home campuses in fall 2020 or are returning to a strange hybrid reality that will significantly reduce their much-desired freedom, engagement in activities, clubs, and sports, and ability to fully enjoy the college lifestyle. For these students, the opportunity to return to their home campus in spring or fall 2021 will likely take priority over study abroad opportunities

Second, study abroad is often seen as an “add-on” that must be carefully woven into a four-year degree. With many students taking a leave-of-absence or opting to take a reduced course load this year, it could become challenging for some of them to fit a semester of study abroad into their program as they return to school in 2021 and attempt to complete their graduation requirements on time.

Third, the economic loss suffered by many families during this pandemic will further amplify the potential for study abroad to be considered as a nice but unfeasible option.

Finally, many students may decide that they have “missed their window of opportunity” to study abroad, particularly those who are currently in their third year of university. 

Building a Potential Path Forward

A quick review of the situation might leave those in our field feeling even less confident about a recovery in 2021. There are many factors that lie outside of our control, particularly those related to the virus and its related health concerns and government policies and plans around the world. Students and their families are struggling to figure out a new road map to help them afford and complete their educational plans, and colleges and universities around the world are reeling from deep financial losses. 

However, as many in our field have pointed out in recent weeks, the current pandemic will make our work in international education increasingly important in the years ahead.

Much as we have done for the past century, international educators will need to re-double their efforts to promote exchange, to rebuild bridges damaged by this storm, and to help students develop the skills and resources they need to become competent and confident members of our global community.

It’s not going to be easy, and the recovery will likely take longer than hoped, but there are various approaches that schools and organizations can take now to help lay the groundwork for the future:


  • Embrace virtual global learning opportunities 

The efforts of faculty, students, administrators, and community partners over the past six months has shown us that virtual courses, internships, and research can be effective on many levels. Learning how to work remotely with people around the world is an important skill. Study abroad, global internships, and research need to be done with greater intentionality when delivered online, but these are valid and valuable opportunities for academic and professional skill development.

They can also be highly cost effective and provide access to students who may not be able to participate in more traditional in-country programs. While it will be extremely important to vet the academic quality and overall rigor and support services for these programs and internships, virtual learning can enhance the academic credit-worthy experiences offered by higher education institutions.


  • Expand short-term international programming

 Short-term study abroad enrollments continue to out-pace semester or academic year international programs. This trend is likely to continue going forward, as students attempt to pack more experiences and opportunities into their four-year undergraduate degrees. Due to the added financial and academic constraints and barriers created by the current pandemic, institutions and organizations should give extra support to short-term international academic programs.

These can be custom programs led by home institution faculty in collaboration with a third-party provider or overseas institutional partner or short-term programs offered by program providers or international partners. The end result is that more students will still have the opportunity to include a global experience in their undergraduate studies. This is good for the students, good for their institutions, and good for all organizations and institutions involved in international education.

 

  • Increase scholarships and reduce/maintain costs to help expand access to international programs

The economic challenges associated with COVID-19 are significant and will have a major impact on students for many years. Students and their families are struggling to afford the high cost of higher education in the U.S., and many of them will be increasingly unable to pay for an international program.

By keeping the price of programs and other international experiences as low as possible and increasing funding to support students with deep financial need, more students will be able to study abroad. This is not a new strategy, and our field has made considerable progress in this area over the past few years. However, it will be an even more important part of the post-pandemic recovery strategy for our students and our field.

 

  • Create new and more creative partnerships

The past six months has resulted in chaos and loss for many institutions and organizations. Smaller study abroad organizations have closed their doors, larger organizations have furloughed or released a large percentage of their staff and have suspended most of their programs indefinitely, and many college and university study abroad offices have reduced staffing levels and remain unsure about how and when they will be able to send their students abroad in the future.

Over the next 6-12 months, it will be valuable for institutions and organizations to re-think their partnerships and their study abroad portfolios.


  • Where might there be new synergies or opportunities for collaboration that will provide sustainable or more creative solutions to the problems that we currently face?
  • How can partners work more closely together to address academic and financial barriers?
  • Are there “legacy” partners or programs that no longer meet the needs of the institution and its students?
  • Are there partners outside of higher education that could offer interesting public-private opportunities? How can private companies partner with schools to provide valuable study abroad experiences and professional development for students while also providing tangible benefits to companies in various sectors?

Develop program models that reflect the needs and interests of Gen Z

Higher education has been evolving in new directions over the past 10 years, and there is increasing debate around the intersection and relative value of “traditional academic learning” and “employability” on university campuses. As Gen Z students try to make sense of the world around them and do their best to adapt to the realities of the current pandemic, they will be increasingly focused on outcomes that meet their academic interests while also preparing them to survive and succeed in the “real world” once they graduate.

Students today seek multiple formal and informal experiences during their undergraduate studies, including both for-credit and not-for-credit courses, internships, projects, research, and other skill-building opportunities. International education can provide multiple pieces to the puzzle for today’s students. There is demonstrated need for more research and internship opportunities, collaboration with peers and mentors on projects, and programs and courses that reflect new academic disciplines, new career paths, and new core skills required to expand one’s employability going forward. In many cases, these new opportunities can be built into existing programs and study abroad frameworks, but there will be a greater need for institutions and organizations to think differently about the needs and interests of our students.

Balance short-term financial emergencies with long-term recovery challenges

Many study abroad organizations, colleges, and universities worldwide are facing significant financial loss and interruption of important revenue streams. While these financial realities are forcing many organizations and institutions to furlough or eliminate staff positions, it’s important for leaders to consider the need for retaining the most experienced and knowledgeable staff. They have the expertise and experience managing teams and navigating difficult situations that will be vital in helping to lead the post-pandemic recovery efforts. While cutting larger salaries now may help in the short-term, doing so could create more significant long-term damage going forward.

The road ahead will have numerous and often unpredictable twists and turns, and our industry’s GPS may not know exactly how to guide us safely and smoothly forward to our destination. However, despite the challenges that we face and the losses that we’ve all had to endure, I remain both hopeful and optimistic about the future of study abroad. We design programs to help make our students more resilient and adaptable. Now it’s time for us to find our own inner resilience and adapt in new ways in order to survive, succeed, and pave the way for a bright post-pandemic international education landscape.

Note: Let's keep the conversation going. Please share your thoughts in the comment box for the original post or reach out to me directly at awr1203@gmail.com.



Friday, September 11, 2020

I spy in the corner of our kitchen window on a chilly overcast afternoon on Friday, September 11, 2020...

Three of these items are related to international education

- My son’s spider plant from second grade four years ago!
- Christ the Redeemer nick-nack I bought for my wife somewhere up at that summit in Rio
- Small elephant that my daughter gifted the family from her pre-eighth grade, eleven day service-tourist trip to Ecuador
- A ‘Handmade in the Holy Land’ gift I gave to my wife that I picked up in the Christian Quarter of the Old City, Jerusalem
- Artsy cross given to one of the kids...either at birth or baptism from a family member
- A little figurine of a Saint...I think it’s the one that you bury in your front yard to help sell your house but I really have no idea




Tuesday, June 2, 2020

I got to meet and talk with Elspeth Jones for her new #IntlEdChat interview series!

I am a big fan of Elspeth Jones, Emerita Professor at Leeds Beckett University, and I have been for many years! So when she invited me to connect for her new #IntlEdChat interview series I jumped at the opportunity. It was our first time meeting and while making that virtual connection was great I look forward to an in person connection sometime in the [hopefully near] future!

You can subscribe to Espeth's International Education YouTube channel here and if you are on Twitter you should follow her at @ElspethJones.

I also want to highlight the Routledge Internationalization in Higher Education book series of which Elspeth serves as the series editor! It's an excellent collection of topics, editors and authors with more on the way! You can learn more about the Routledge Internationalization in Higher Education book series here.


Wednesday, April 29, 2020

Beyond COVID-19: How International Education Needs to Measure its Overall Health

The following is a guest post by Tom Millington who is the Founder and Executive Director of Abroadia.  I'm a big fan of Tom and the perspective he brings to the international education dialogue and I am very pleased to post his piece to IHEC Blog.

Beyond COVID-19: How International Education Needs to Measure its Overall Health

“I don’t think anyone expected it to be like this,” observed Mark Kasanic, 48, to the New York Times in a recent interview.  No one, including those of us in the field of international education, expected the rapid spread and devastation that the COVID-19 virus has inflicted on the world. In the US we now have over 20 million Americans filing for unemployment insurance and in the coming days that number will increase greatly. But while many workers in various professions have felt the impact of the reaction to COVID-19 on their professional lives, international educators will feel it more acutely, because the issue of unemployment in the field has not really been examined, discussed, or planned for. Long on “poetry” and short on “plumbing”[1] the field of international education has such an expansive vision for its manufacture of “global citizens” that it fails to include in its scope the welfare of its practitioners. This failure will be exacerbated for months to come during and following the COVID-19 crisis, but the reality is that there has been mounting frustration for quite some time well before we learned about “social distancing”.

A respondent to the 2015 Unemploymentin International Education Survey lamented, “I love this field, but I don't think that the field treats its employees very well.” This is a far cry from the sentiment iterated by Everett C. Hughes in 1951:

                        [A] man’s work is one of the more important parts of his
                        social identity, of his self; of his fate in the one life he has
                        to live, for there is something almost as irrevocable about
                        choice of occupation as there is about choice of mate.[2]

Granted, five decades passed between the quotes and times certainly have changed. Professions have improved, but international education has not kept up with the times in how it manages and supports the very people who implement its heralded concept. While college and university professors have the American Association of University Professors to advocate for them and administrators have a similar group in the American Association of University Administrators, there is no active equivalent for international educators. NAFSA and the Forum on Education Abroad could very well fill this niche, but they should not have to be compelled to do this; they should consider it in alignment with their valuation of international education as an integral part of higher education. Without this specific advocacy group then the very concept of international education and its implementation become arbitrary and its practitioners relegated to fungible components in the structure of higher education, often blowing in the winds of change emanating from the offices of the president or provost.

What is more, in the absence of an international educator advocacy group (various international education groups advocate for the vision but do nowhere near enough to protect their practitioners) there is little to no attention paid to displaced international educators. And in times of crisis, predator elements of our society are bound to take advantage. I recently read a posting by a recruiting consultant who advocated for “poaching” employees of other organizations during times of crisis. I will let the readers form their opinions about that approach.

Less predatory, but no less damaging is long-term unemployment. As of February 2020, the rate of unemployment in the US rested at 3.5 %. If we take a big-picture view, this is a good trend as it illustrates significant job growth. For example, in 2011, the unemployment rate was at 8.5%. However, a closer look at the numbers reveals something more sinister that is seldom discussed. Long-term unemployment (defined as being without work for 27 months or longer) in 2010 comprised 45% of all unemployed Americans and in 2014 that figure dropped to 32%. With the onset of COVID-19 we may see another surge in the number of long-term unemployed individuals. At this time, there has been little effort on the part of international education to track these numbers. It is time that it did.

It is important to determine the relative health of a profession. What metrics would be used to measure this? Currently, international education has no measures to assess its overall health (this does not include recording attendance at mega-events such as the NAFSA annual conferences, or the number of students who study abroad, etc.). Proponents of international education often laud the profession for producing “global citizens”. Yet, there is no mechanism to track the growth or diminution of the field. How many people enter or leave the field each year? Simply tabulating the number of students who study abroad each year is not enough; If we look to other disciplines we will see approaches that our field may use to help us gauge important trends such as inflow and outflow of people in the field.

The American Historical Association (AHA), annually tracks the number of history doctorates awarded and tracks job openings to assess the prospects for job searchers in the discipline. It even tracks non-history careers that history PhDs obtain. Given the diversity in the backgrounds, education and training of international education, it would be difficult to measure the number of “international education” degrees awarded annually. But later in this post I will suggest a method to address part of the problem. For now, let us look at why it is important to collect this data in the first place.

Economists and labor theory specialists use a term known as vacancy rate (also known as the Beveridge Curve) to compare the unemployment rate with job openings. In her article, “Long-Term Unemployment: A Destructive and Persistent Social Issue,” Kaitlin Louie details the challenge of the vacancy rate by pointing out that, “Typically, high unemployment rates are accompanied by low job vacancy rates, indicating that there are not enough jobs to meet job seekers’ demands. Correspondingly, when job vacancies rise, unemployment should fall as job seekers fill these positions. However, after the Great Recession, both unemployment rates and job vacancy rates remained elevated, indicating that employers have jobs available, but are not choosing from the pool of available workers.” How will the COVID-19 pandemic affect the vacancy rate in international education? That remains to be seen, but we are already starting see the effects of the virus on some employers in international education.

The longer an individual is unemployed, the more an inaccurate perception is attached to him/her. Some studies show a tendency for employers to hire short-term unemployed over those who have had no work for longer periods of time. When I was unemployed, I recall encountering applications that asked, “Are you currently unemployed?” Is this discrimination? I believe that in the absence of an oversight of job announcements or a “Standards of Good Hiring Practice in IE” potential employers are allowed enough leeway to use the length of unemployment as a criterion in making some hires. Part of a “Standards of Good Hiring Practice in IE” would be to ensure that everyone applying for a position at a US-based institution would have the same opportunity that other candidates enjoy. Many institutions use a candidate’s nationality or place of birth as criteria to preclude them from advancing in the selection process. My colleague, Celia Ogna, recently shared her experience with me. She said she noticed that, “When applying, the very first question asked is about work eligibility in the US. I would tick the box saying I need sponsorship, since it is the case. After you finish applying, you receive an automatic email saying your application was received. But in about 40% of the cases, I received a second automatic message, saying that I ticked the box saying I need a visa, and that they therefore encourage me to reapply when I am eligible. And that is frustrating when you spend hours polishing your application, and no-one, absolutely no-one is even going to read it. If they had mentioned it in their opening, I would not have applied. These are often the same universities, and with time I know which one do that, and which one actually consider foreigners.”

Institutional Betrayal of International Education

The psychologist Jennifer Freyd first introduced the term “institutional betrayal” to the higher education vernacular to capture the acts of universities or colleges that fail to take accusations of sexual assault seriously, or even to impugn the victims of such assaults. I am in no way comparing “de-internationalization” efforts to sexual assaults, but I like the connotation of a betrayal committed by institutions who pledge their efforts to internationalize their campuses and curriculum, but then readily jettison them with the onset of a crisis. Anyone can send students abroad; the real challenge is finding ways to refrain from internalizing or reducing internationalization. Colleges and universities must find ways to prevent the layoffs of international educators. There are always other competing priorities on campuses (athletics, the arts, technology, etc.), but a true commitment to internationalization means that protecting it remains at the top of the list. With so few colleges and universities releasing information on how they have downsized their international programs offices, it is difficult to gain a clear picture of the impact COVID-19 has had on campuses across the US.

This short-sightedness is not limited to just colleges and universities. During the Great Recession I decided to contact a NAFSA senior-level administrator, via his blog, to call attention to the plight of unemployed international educators. I had hoped to start a conversation and to learn his perspective and insight on the issue. Rather than respond directly to me, however, he decided to ask a colleague of his (not affiliated with NAFSA) to join my advocacy group, discourage members from supporting that group and to promote services and support that NAFSA allegedly offered to support unemployed international educators (we never did see what they were exactly). This reaction from someone seen as a senior leader in international education was disheartening, but symptomatic of a larger problem. Silence in the face of mass layoffs in international education and other professions subtly shifts the blame from the economy, the system or the profession to the unemployed themselves. The longer a person is unemployed, the more likely they are to begin blaming themselves for their situation.

Fortunately, with the passage of time and a new crisis, some of the key drivers of international education have become much more proactive in addressing the current crisis of unemployment in the field. The Forum on Education Abroad has created the COVID-19 Recovery Program that waives the annual membership fees for international educators displaced by the pandemic. Hopefully, others such as NAFSA and the Association of International Education administrators (AIEA) will follow suit with similar measures.

A new ethos for international education in a post-pandemic world?

As campuses and providers resort to offering virtual and remote strategies to substitute for in situ study abroad experiences, we must step back and look at what is happening to our field. It is too early, obviously, to even fathom the long-term effects of the pandemic on our profession, but we must begin to look at the very ethos of what we do and consider that it may assume a new identity moving forward. Paraphrasing the Czech playwright Václav Havel, we must throw ourselves “into the question of international education by manifesting its absence.”[3]

Students and faculty now cross borders virtually in lieu of physically arriving at a new location abroad. By removing the experience of physically being in another country—the sine qua non of study abroad—are we altering the very essence of an international experience? Should we now divest ourselves of the term “international education” in favor of something like Éducateurs Sans Frontiers (inspired by Médecins Sans Frontières). “International” implies movement and directionality; something that no longer applies to the field at the moment. “Éducateurs Sans Frontiers” is more general and encompasses the newer myriad forms of providing and acquiring a cross-cultural experience. “International education” places more emphasis on the final product: students having a transformative international experience and “éducateurs sans frontiers” highlights the role of the individual who makes international education happen. In the “international education” paradigm, international educators are replaceable commodities; not so in the new palingenetic form that emerges in the post-pandemic era. We should make this the new legacy of “international education”.

What Can We Do?

Once the COVID-19 fades and some semblance of normalcy returns, the moment will be propitious for the field of international education to engage in some soul searching and identify ways to improve its overall health. Here are some suggestions:

·       Establish a mechanism to track the inflow and outflow of international educators. Determine answers to questions such as: how many newcomers joined the field during the X-X academic year? How many have left the field? How many are currently unemployed?

·       Devise a metric that measures an institution’s commitment and aspirations to internationalization. This metric would follow actions taken by the institution that are not reflected in Open Doors data tables, but will highlight another form of internationalization by demonstrating how often the institution reduces the budget or staff of its international programs. In times of crises such as the Great Recession of 2008 and COVID-19 institutions that retained its international programs staff or at least minimized the deleterious effects of these economic disruptions should receive high marks.

·       Create a database that keeps track of all new job openings in international education every year and then measuring the number of applicants for that position. Determine a rubric to serve as an indicator of how well the international educator job market is doing. If a job announcement attracts 200 more applications, would that mean the market is tight or that the field is saturated? [4]  Would 50 applications convey a sense that the field is doing well and that there are enough positions for interested candidates? At some point international education is going to have to sit down and establish metrics to gauge these trends. To inspire institutions to comply, for example, NAFSA can make this measurement part of the screening or vetting process for the Paul Simon Award for Campus Internationalization. If an institution is serious about internationalization, then it will make extra efforts to protect the mission and staff responsible for implementing it on campus. Almost as important as the number of students sent abroad annually, is the low turnover of international education programs in moments of crisis.

·       Set up a national organization that advocates for the employment of international educators. This entity could monitor the challenges to the international education workforce and make recommendations to NAFSA: Association of International Educators, Forum on Education Abroad and the Association of International Education Administrators recommending ways to make their respective annual conferences more inclusive for in-transition international educators.  

·       Inject more empathy into planning for international education’s mega events such as the NAFSA annual conference. To its credit, NAFSA waives the conference registration for individuals who volunteer to work at the conference. But the commitment required by NAFSA allows little to no time for the person to network or attend sessions. I encourage NAFSA, Forum on Education Abroad and the Association of International Education Administrators to explore new ways to enable unemployed international educators to participate in their collective network of conferences, workshops, etc.

·       Inaugurate online support groups for unemployed international educators. This does not have to be anything extraordinary. This be a forum on https://www.mentorcloud.com/ or a Facebook group, but it is extremely important to give voice to those who have been displaced.  Rather than laying off staff, “anchor” or “tether” them by inviting them to participate in online seminars, training sessions, etc. Keeping them connected to the field is almost as important as receiving severance pay.

·       Form a relationship with the Institute for Career Transitions to share resources and launch initiatives to support in-transition international educators.  

·       Publish a “Standards of Good Hiring Practice in International Education” that provides guidelines and resources for both employers and employees.

The task ahead of us is immense, mostly because we have extraordinarily little data to work with, but this does not minimize the serious challenge to the overall health of the field, which international education has not fully realized yet. Moving forward the field will have to begin establishing indicators to monitor its health, as most other professions do (see the tables in the Rand Ghayad and William Dickens policy brief What We Can Learn by Disaggregating the Unemployment-Vacancy Relationship?”). We now move into new territory where the field must focus on its practitioners as much as it does its students and initiatives. In short, the field must implement what the historian Jay Winter terms a “root and branch transformation.”[5] While examining ways to reinvent the field after COVID-19, we must also look at how to track and advocate for the people who work in international education. For far too long the field has been indifferent to the plight of displaced international educators.



[1] I paraphrase the “poetry” and “plumbing” expression from Andrew Bacevich. See Bacevich, The Age of Illusions: How America Squandered its Cold War Victory, Metropolitan Books, 2020, p. 67.
[2] Quoted in Lee Braude. Work and Workers: A Sociological Analysis. New York: Praeger Publishers: 1975. p. 127.
[3] See Václav Havel. Disturbing the peace. trans. Paul Wilson. New York, Alfred Knopf, 1990, 52-53. Quoted in Jay Winter. Dreams of Peace and Freedom: Utopian Moments in the 20th Century. Yale University Press. 2006, p. 161. The original quote reads “threw us into the question of meaning by manifesting its absence.”
[4] Kathleen Grevers has done extensive research on the saturation of international education. Contact her via her LinkedIn profile: linkedin.com/in/kathleengrevers.
[5] Winter, p. 3

Sunday, March 22, 2020

Rugby and my International Travels

Last week on a Zoom call for my institution's Incident Assessment Task Force (IATF), the Chief of Staff to the President said to everyone that our daily IATF Zoom calls allow us to learn a little more about each other and one example he gave was that I'm an England Rugby fan because I was wearing their jersey.  I just happen to have the England jersey and it is one I randomly bought back around 2000-2001 when I saw it in the store!


I got into rugby (but have no idea what the rules are) when I arrived to my hotel in Auckland ~1:30am after beginning my journey from the 2017 AIEC conference in Hobart, Tasmania and at that time of night the check-in was in the bar. The All Blacks were on many of the TV’s so I decided to help the local New Zealand brewing companies and hydrate while watching the match before ever going up to my hotel room!

I also got to watch Ireland crush Scotland (27-3) in the 2019 Rugby World Cup group stage over a full Irish breakfast in Dublin back in September which was an incredibly wonderful treat!